He leaned upon it heavily. We continued our route in search of the Amontillado. We passed through a range of low arches, descended, passed on, and, descending again, arrived at a deep crypt, in which the foulness of the air caused our flambeaux rather to glow than flame. At the most remote end of the crypt there appeared another less spacious.
In this case he had three choices: Montresor, Fortunato, or a disconnected narrator. Consider what the story would have been if Fortunato had told the story. It is tempting to think that we may have learned something more about the supposed insults he offered Montresor It is tempting to think that we may have learned something more about the supposed insults he offered Montresor which apparently prompted this entire episode; however, it seems unlikely that Fortunato actually did or said anything insulting, so all we would have gotten was a story full of unanswered questions and confusion.
In fact, even as Montresor was putting the last brick in the wall, it is not clear that Fortunato really understood what was happening to him or why.
He would not have been an effective teller of this story. A detached narrator might have worked, would certainly have worked better than Fortunato; however, we certainly would not experience quite the same horror as when we hear Montresor talk about his unholy acts.
We might have had the facts but not experienced the same reaction. So, Poe chose to use the first-person point of view so Montresor could tell his own story and attempt to justify his unjustifiable actions. The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.
You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitively settled -- but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk.
I must not only punish, but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser.
It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong. It is obviously told in the first person because the narrator uses first-person pronouns and shares with us his thoughts.
Unfortunately for us the readersMontresor is not a reliable narrator. We know that a man capable of such a cold-blooded act cannot be completely sane, and we see no evidence that Fortunato has done any of the things Montresor accuses him of doing.The Cask of Amontillado.
by Edgar Allan Poe (published ) THE thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge. Renowned as the creator of the detective story and a master of horror, the author of "The Red Mask of Death," "The Black Cat," and "The Murders of the Rue Morgue," Edgar Allan Poe seems to have derived his success from suffering and to have suffered from his success.
Edgar Allan Poe’s use of the first-person point of view is often memorably effective. Take, for instance, the opening sentences of “The Cask of .
The Poe Decoder offers essays about Edgar Allan Poe's life and works written by qualified people. This Web site is dedicated to the wonderful world of the short story and to all who enjoy reading shorts stories as I do. I will try to add a few short stories every month.
Summary "The Cask of Amontillado" has been almost universally referred to as Poe's most perfect short story; in fact, it has often been considered to be one of the world's most perfect short stories.